Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of website monitoring tools: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:47, 30 July 2009

Revision as of 11:57, 1 August 2009

Line 6:

* '''Delete''' while I think that almost all of the rationale for this deletion is only cause to edit the article, the first reason is sufficient: Article fails [[WP:NOT]]. It's certainly helpful, but it's not really WP's thing. Describing what a Web site monitoring tool ''is'' would be reasonable. Perhaps even listing some articles comparing them from the popular trade press would be fine, but such comparisons are ephemeral and their criteria subjective. Not encyclopedic. -[[User:Miskaton|Miskaton]] ([[User talk:Miskaton|talk]]) 22:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

*'''Delete''' This is just an attempt to establish a reason to spam Wikipedia with a bunch of "website monitoring tools". On a page like [[List of social networking websites]] editors regularly have to revert red-link additions of non-notable sites with the edit summary including [[WP:WTAF|write the article first]]. The list in this AFD is almost empty except for red links to non-notable companies who individually fail [[WP:CORP]]. This list fails [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 11:57, 1 August 2009 (UTC)