Revision as of 21:35, 20 August 2009 edit Pcap (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 18,285 edits →Merge anonymous function here: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:46, 20 August 2009 edit undo Pcap (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 18,285 edits →Merge anonymous function here: jargoniada Next edit →
Line 129: That article ''wants'' to describe the same concept. An ''anonymous'' function [[per se]] is damn useless. What makes it useful is that it can be passed around. But that article fails to explain this, or pretty much anything, besides giving some examples that largely overlap with this article. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit\|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit\|<small>ping</small>]] 21:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC) : Rather tellingly, that article does not cite a single programming languages theory book, but use plenty of jargon from various implementations as if they were theoretical concepts universally known by that name. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit\|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit\|<small>ping</small>]] 21:46, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:First-class function: Difference between revisions