Revision as of 06:46, 13 June 2009 edit Natecull (talk \| contribs) 301 edits →I don't get it ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:51, 21 August 2009 edit undo Pcap (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 18,285 edits →Why is the Haskell Y the Y combinator?: new section Next edit →
Line 108: Unfortunately, this uses a lispy syntax, which most people are not familiar with. We should work this into something that could go into the article. — <span style="font-variant:small-caps;font-family:sans-serif;">[[User:Edward Z. Yang\|Edward Z. Yang]]</span><sup style="font-family:serif;">([[User talk:Edward Z. Yang\|Talk]])</sup> 06:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC) == Why is the Haskell Y the Y combinator? == Technically the Haskell definition is the equation that defines ''any'' fixed point combinator no? So why is it Y? [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit\|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit\|<small>ping</small>]] 04:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Fixed-point combinator: Difference between revisions