Revision as of 04:23, 28 August 2009 edit AshtonBenson (talk \| contribs) 722 edits mNo edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:24, 28 August 2009 edit undo AshtonBenson (talk \| contribs) 722 edits m →importance Next edit →
Line 158: There are many more references than this; the relationship between PRA and finitism has been thoroughly explored in the literature. — Carl <small>([[User:CBM\|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM\|talk]])</small> 01:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC) :: ~~Uh,~~This ~~just~~merely cites the same paper you cite above by Tait. There's really no additional content there. And, as a side note, I don't know if I'd count the FOMlist as a reliable source ;) [[User:AshtonBenson\|AshtonBenson]] ([[User talk:AshtonBenson\|talk]]) 04:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC) :I guess I don't understand Astonbenson's notion of "notable", or "important". The following is certainly ''historically'' important. So I'll offer it up:

Talk:Primitive recursive function: Difference between revisions