Content deleted Content added
TakuyaMurata (talk | contribs) |
→Def, scope, mess: look |
||
Line 77:
::And that's the problem. All I'm saying is that, if possible, the article should be rewritten so that it isn't about one specific example. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] ([[User talk:TakuyaMurata|talk]]) 21:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
::: Look the first sentence is an unsourced definition. I'm undable to find a book that gives that def. How do you expect an article to be written based on that? We should salvage the rest of it, i.e. the notions of boxing, unboxing and autoboxing. "Not general enough" can mean a number of different things here, like being too Java-focused, but that's a different matter that can be addressed later. The title should describe the article's contents, not some ideal notion that ''you'' think we should have an article on, but for which there are no (obvious) sources. [[User:Pohta ce-am pohtit|Pcap]] [[User_talk:Pohta ce-am pohtit|<small>ping</small>]] 06:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
| |||