Revision as of 00:03, 8 April 2004 edit 68.167.249.197 (talk) an exception proving the rule; disambig COBRA and CORBA ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:40, 8 April 2004 edit undo Dysprosia (talk \| contribs) 28,388 edits :I would argue that File transfer protocol should be moved to FTP, though Remote procedure call should stay as it is. This is because there is not just one file transfer protocol. Having a page t Next edit →
Line 9: :That's right! [[User:I am sexy\|I am sexy]] 23:46, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC) :I would argue that [[File transfer protocol]] should be moved to FTP, though Remote procedure call should stay as it is. This is because there is not just one file transfer protocol. Having a page title like "File transfer protocol" or "Common object request broker architecture" implies that there is more than one - for example - "a file transfer protocol is..." or "a common object request broker architecture", whilst "an FTP" or "a CORBA" is less appropriate. [[User:Dysprosia\|Dysprosia]] 06:40, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC) == an exception proving the rule; disambig COBRA and CORBA ==

Talk:Common Object Request Broker Architecture: Difference between revisions