Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Sam Spade: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 84:
In the past you have asserted that you make no effort to differentiate fact from opinion. Is this still your position? [[User:Bensaccount|Bensaccount]] 19:22, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
:That begs the question. Did I ever say that? Where? What is truth? This is an encyclopedia w a NPOV policy, our job is to cite opinions in a neutral manner, not adjudicate on absolute truth. [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 18:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
===Questions from [[User:NatusRoma]]===▼
Is the [[User:Sam Spade/Detective agency|Spade & Archer]] detective agency still active? If so, will it become inactive if you become an arbitrator? If it will remain active, will your membership in it continue? [[User:NatusRoma|NatusRoma]] 06:01, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
:Its only marginally active, and I don't see any reason why that would change if I were elected. Best case scenario it would take off, and provide an invaluable resource to the committee (much like the [[WP:AMA]]).
==Question from Ted Wilkes==
Do you support the creation of a [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct]] as I have just now suggested at [[User talk:Jimbo Wales#A sincere question]]? - [[User:Ted Wilkes|Ted Wilkes]] 18:44, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
:I support a code of conduct, altho I do not at this time take a stand on the particulars of your proposal (my off the cuff sentiment is that your proposal does not go far enough). [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 18:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||