Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flex programming language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Petr.adamek (talk | contribs) m →[[Flex_programming_language]]: keep |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6:
*'''Redirect''' to [[Flex lexical analyzer]]. It is very rare for a proprietary computer language to have any real influence on the world at large; Visual Basic, Applescript, and similar OS or API-specific scripting languages are probably the only significant exceptions. (Consider [[Rebol]] -- it seems to be targeted at the same audience as Perl or Python, but it has no visibility to speak of, at least partly because it's proprietary.) [[User:Haikupoet|Haikupoet]] 05:28, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' – This isn't well known language, but it has some interesting ideas and I have read some articles about them. I don't use it (it doesn't work on my platform and I prefer mainstream languages), but I don't agree that it is completely insignificant. --[[User:Petr.adamek|Petr.adamek]] 10:22, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete.''' Not notable. [[User:Tom.k|Tom.k]] 10:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||