Revision as of 16:30, 12 September 2009 edit 69.40.242.176 (talk) →Article lacking ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:31, 12 September 2009 edit undo 69.40.242.176 (talk) →Article lacking Next edit →
Line 2: This article lacks source examples and a discussion of how the different paradigms encompassed by Oz "harmoniously blends together". In its current state it is ''factually'' informative but of little actual informative use for programmers or computer linguists. [[User:Mikademus\|Mikademus]] 13:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC) == Case statement: case x of nil ← means NOTHING to me :: article presumes knowledge of language syntax and semantics. Extremely ~~pooly~~poorly thought out. WTF is "first class" ?? Written by Oz insiders apparently for the benefit of Oz insiders. Benefit to their ego, that is. Contains "MOST" paradigms?!?! "Including"...this looks to be copied from some synopsis of an article. Is NOt factually informative. Jargon content: Extreme. Information content:Low (unless information of jargon is presumed to be available)[[Special:Contributions/69.40.242.176\|69.40.242.176]] ([[User talk:69.40.242.176\|talk]]) 16:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC) ==Requested move==

Talk:Oz (programming language): Difference between revisions