Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZOMBIE programming language: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 4:
*'''Delete''', one-off original research. [[User:Gazpacho|Gazpacho]] 00:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''', joke. [[User:Pavel Vozenilek|Pavel Vozenilek]] 04:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' (though I'm definitely in favor of '''BJAODN'''ing it!) the big key issue here being the fact that it describes itself as an "unimplemented" language. Speaking of which, someone bloody well ought to go through [[:Category:Esoteric programming languages]] - there's definitely some more that are "unimplemented" too, especially the ones that were described in some joke article ages ago and someone decided to create an article for ''every single one of them''. Anyway, if this gets nuked, I hope that's a precedent enough to say that "unimplemented" languages are not yet notable enough to have an article. (At least spend an afternoon cursing at Perl to get an interpreter done, okay, folks?) --''[[User:Wwwwolf|wwwwolf]]'' ([[User talk:Wwwwolf|barks]]/[[Special:Contributions/Wwwwolf|growls]]) 04:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
|