Content deleted Content added
→EEML is unrelated to UEML: new section |
→EEML is unrelated to UEML: Writing a separate article about the Unified Enterprise Modelling Language seems like a good idea. |
||
Line 45:
== EEML is unrelated to UEML ==
The Unified
At least the redirections from UEML to EEML should be removed. I also offer to contribute a separate page on UEML based on the (free-for-all) materials on the Wiki. If I do not hear otherwise, I will proceed to do so in a few days.
[[User:Alopdahl|Alopdahl]] ([[User talk:Alopdahl|talk]]) 15:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
:Hi Andreas. Writing a separate article about the [[Unified Enterprise Modelling Language]] seems like a good idea. I will be glad to give you a hand, when ever needed. Now I didn't make the initial redirect, see ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Unified_Enterprise_Modelling_Language&action=history here]'', but I did write the current history section, which claims UEML is an further development of EEML, which I read in François Vernadat (2002). Now you claim UEML and EEML are unrelated. But even in [http://www.uemlwiki.org/ uemlwiki.org] the page on the background states:
::''It developed and demonstrated a common abstract syntax and exchange format, which incorporated three important industrial European enterprise modelling languages: EEML (EXTERNAL 2000), GRAI (Doumeingts, Vallespir, Zanettin & Chen 1992) and IEM (Jochem & Mertins 1999). ''
:So it seems to me they are not that unrelated. Both seems a product of EU funding, and if I am not mistaken the developement of UEML started after EEML was developed. Some people seemed to be om both development teams, but this is just a guess. On the other end your the expert here, and I am just an outsider (My effort here is part of my attempt to get a PhD started in this field).
:One remark which could be helpfull. You are planning to use the material of the uemlwiki.org, which you claim is free-for-all. At the wiki itself I couldn't find any disclaimer, which explains the terms of use. In Wikipedia this is often a source of trouble. -- [[User:Mdd|Marcel Douwe Dekker]] ([[User talk:Mdd|talk]]) 21:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
| |||