Content deleted Content added
Adding RFC on behalf of Arteyu |
|||
Line 7:
::I noticed this move; it really ought to have gone through some sort of procedure, rather than being done unilaterally. Squash ''is'' a widely used word with a lot of different, unrelated meanings, however, so I can see the advantage of having the main 'squash' article as a disambiguation. In this case the user has [[WP:BOLD|been bold]] and I'd probably just about agree with the move. --[[User:Pretty Green|Pretty Green]] ([[User talk:Pretty Green|talk]]) 12:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
:::Best I canremember, MOS suggests that the most common usage be the main refferal. Personally, I would put the main one to link to the vegetable with a "otheruses" tag directed first to the sport and then to the ambiguation page. That's my 3O on the matter based on how I remember the MOS gidelines. <b><font face="Arial" color="teal">[[User:Jaakobou|Jaakobou]]</font><font color="1F860E"><sup>''[[User talk:Jaakobou|Chalk Talk]]''</sup></font></b> 17:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
==[[Squash (sport)]] → [[Squash]]==
{{rfctag|style}}
Should I move back [[Squash]] → [[Squash (disambiguation)]] and [[Squash (sport)]] → [[Squash]]. A user recently moved it without proper discussion and without concrete reasoning. I agree with [[User:Grutness|Grutness]] on his/her edit on January 5, 2009 – ''"moved Talk:Squash to Talk:Squash (disambiguation): preparing to move the sport here - 49 of the top 50 google hits, and most of the incoming links are to the sport"'' —[[User:Arteyu|Arteyu]] <small>(via [[User:RFC posting script|posting script]])</small> 18:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
| |||