Talk:Shor's algorithm: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m moved from Talk:Shors algorithm
Koyaanis Qatsi (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1:
The article said the best classical factoring algorithms are O(e^N). The author presumably meant theta rather than O. The General Number Field Sieve [http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/398050.html] is significantly faster than that, with a running time of theta(exp(((64/9)*log N)<sup>1/3</sup> (log log N)<sup>2/3</sup>). I've changed the sentence to claim superpolynomial rather than exponential. --[[user:LC|LC]]
 
Okey dokey. You might want to make a wiki node on that. -- [[user:CYD|CYD]]
 
OK. It's [[:integer factorization|integer factorization]]. --[[user:LC|LC]]
 
Thanks! -- [[user:CYD|CYD]]