Revision as of 03:52, 17 June 2008 edit Oleg Alexandrov (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 47,270 edits m moved Talk:Semi-implicit Euler to Talk:Semi-implicit Euler method: noun ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:40, 2 October 2009 edit undo DJIndica (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 960 edits Question regarding Hamiltonian systems Next edit →
Line 41: == Method name == This is the same thing as semi-explicit Euler, right? Would it anger anyone if suggested the article be renamed to either [[Semi-explicit Euler]] or [[Symplectic Euler]] since those are the names people are familiar with? --[[User:Numsgil\|Numsgil]] ([[User talk:Numsgil\|talk]]) 18:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC) == Arguments of ''f'' and ''g'' == When solving the equations of motion for a damped, driven oscillator the acceleration is a function of both ''x'' and ''v'' and I don't see in principle why the velocity couldn't also be a function of ''x''. I was going to make this change but I wonder if this would have a bearing on whether the system is a Hamiltonian system. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? I have used this method to obtain solutions for the damped, driven oscillator and the results seem to agree with other methods.--[[User:DJIndica\|DJIndica]] ([[User talk:DJIndica\|talk]]) 20:40, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Semi-implicit Euler method: Difference between revisions