Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Jpgordon: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 68:
--[[User:-Ril-|Victim of signature fascism]] 16:00, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
==Question from [[User:Justforasecond|Jusforasecond]]==
===Support of a user with numerous policy violations===
Could you explain your rationale behind supporting [[User:deeceevoice]], a user who has broken wikipedia policies on numerous occassions? Many of her violations are documented at her RfC[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Deeceevoice] and RfAr[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Deeceevoice], and include use of the term "crakkka". Some of her language is targeted towards vandals, but much of is directed towards editors in good standing. Is it your belief that some editors should be permitted to ignore wikipedia policies?
===Attacks on users filing RfArs===
I filed the RfA against deeceevoice. As far as I can tell, this is the proposed solution when a user violates wiki policy and refuses to address an RfC. Can you tell me, then, why you've posted comments on my talk page saying that I make you "sick to your stomach" for filing the RfAr? What do you believe is the appropriate action when a user has violated policy repeatedly and refuses to respond to an RfC? Do you support attacks on users who have followed protocol and filed RfArs to address wikipedia issues? Lastly, why have you chosen to support a user who has a well-documented history of violating policy, while attacking me?
Thanks for your time
[[User:Justforasecond|Justforasecond]] 23:07, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||