Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2:
:Yes, it is notable. Factor is the product of 6 years of work, is the work of over 30 people and has been mentioned in at least two academic papers. It's not helpful to go around to articles about programming languages and call them non-notable. <small>[[User:LittleDan|LittleDan]]</small><sup>[[User talk:LittleDan|talk]]</sup> 02:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
How long it has been around is irrelevant. How many people it is the work of is irrelevant (my website is the work of hundreds of people, but it does not have its own Wikipedia article). Academics invent programming languages all the time; most of them are non-notable. I'm not convinced Factor is notable.
Furthermore, I don't appreciate the hostility of your tone. Assume good faith. I put all of those tags because Wikipedia is overrun with pet project programming languages that don't really meet the notability criteria. I have placed the tag back on this article, please do not remove it without better evidence. [[Special:Contributions/64.191.188.252|64.191.188.252]] ([[User talk:64.191.188.252|talk]]) 15:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
==Interpreted language?==
| |||