Talk:Factor (programming language): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Stesch (talk | contribs)
LittleDan (talk | contribs)
Line 15:
 
::I just noticed that the notability of the language had been questioned on this very page before but that that discussion had apparently been seen as {{diff|Talk:Factor (programming language)|next|184768066|"useless and harmful"}}. —[[User:Tobias Bergemann|Tobias Bergemann]] ([[User talk:Tobias Bergemann|talk]]) 13:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 
:Factor has influenced at least two other programming languages, Cat and Concat. Cat has an article whose notability is not questioned, even though it has had much less code written in it and has a much less developed implementation. Concat was described in a paper published in July at an international computer science conference. Both of these are now cited in the article. It seems that these should imply notability. <small>[[User:LittleDan|LittleDan]]</small><sup>[[User talk:LittleDan|talk]]</sup> 16:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 
==Interpreted language?==