Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argument from fallacy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Keep. I believe others will find other references, as it is a topic of academic discussion. |
m formatting |
||
Line 25:
*'''Keep''' Google Scholar and Google Book search show enough results. Some lawyers use this term a lot it seems. Article is well done, showing some good examples that very clearly explained the concept. [[User:Dream Focus | '''<span style="color:blue">D</span><span style="color:green">r</span><span style="color:red">e</span><span style="color:orange">a</span><span style="color:purple">m</span> <span style="color:blue">Focus</span>]]''' 04:31, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
:*'''reply''' You gotta read the sources! The scholar ones have NOTHING to do with this term... just happen to be the same words in the same order... '''nothing to do with this article''' (bolded because I already pointed that out above). Also, the discussion above indicates that web searches get only non-RS sources (mostly WP mirrors). If you found something different, please tell us so I can change my vote. [[User:T34CH|T34CH]] ([[User talk:T34CH|talk]]) 18:06, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. The fallacy is discussed by logicians, though not necessarily under that name. I have added a reference to a book published by Springer (which publishes textbooks and academic works) and tightened up the wording a bit. -<span style="font:bold 10px Verdana;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#ECF1F7;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[[User:moritheil|moritheil]]</span><sup>[[User_talk:moritheil|Talk]]</sup> 19:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
| |||