Revision as of 01:02, 28 October 2009 edit Abductive (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 132,183 edits Delete ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:46, 28 October 2009 edit undo Moritheil (talk \| contribs) 723 edits →Argument from fallacy: renaming the article may be apropos but this is a known fallacy Next edit →
Line 28: '''Keep.''' Meets basic sourcing requirements. The logic itself is valid. --[[User:Whoosit\|Whoosit]] ([[User talk:Whoosit\|talk]]) 23:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC) '''Delete''' I cannot find a source that defines this fallacy. Most of the Google returns say "separate argument from fallacy" or the like; in other words, this is a combination of words that happens to occur while talking about arguments. It is not, however, a known, capital-F '''F'''allacy. <font face="Cambria">[[User:Abductive\|<font color="teal">'''Abductive'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Abductive\|reasoning]])</font> 01:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC) :Did you look at the source in the article? It appears that logicians do not call it by this name, but it is nevertheless a known fallacy. Renaming the article may be appropriate. -<span style="font:bold 10px Verdana;display:inline;border:#000066 1px solid;background-color:#ECF1F7;padding:0 4px 0 4px;">[[User:moritheil\|moritheil]]</span><sup>[[User_talk:moritheil\|Talk]]</sup> 03:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argument from fallacy: Difference between revisions