Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:45, 8 December 2005

Revision as of 22:17, 21 December 2005

Line 162:

: I should think candidates for ArbCom would be willing to accept a simply practical standard like 250-300 words. To state so plainly that you do not intend to honor that speaks right to character. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 21:45, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

==Two questions of paramount importance==

I would like to thank the editors who requested that each candidate take a position for or against the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Code of Conduct]] and [[Wikipedia:User Bill of Rights]]. We need arbitrators who will support and adhere to these proposed policies, to stop the rapid devolution of Wikipedia. --<font color ="darkred"><font face ="georgia">[[User:Herschelkrustofsky|HK]]</font></font> 22:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)