Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmarteScript: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Miami33139 (talk | contribs) |
→SmarteScript: keep |
||
Line 12:
*'''Weak Keep''' - The software has been covered [http://www.itjungle.com/fhs/fhs092209-story09.html here], and more importantly in [http://www.ddj.com/architect/184415395 Dr. Dobb's] which is a well recognized magazine for software development. Also [http://www.sdtimes.com/link/28630], and [http://www.testmagazine.co.uk/2009/07/smartesoft-announces-the-release-of-smarteqm-version-2-2/] which are somewhat press releasish so I'd tend to not put a lot of weight to them for notability but in support of the Dr. Dobb's review, I'd put this over the notability bar. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 16:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Looking at sources above by whpq, the ITJunge is a press release reprint. Dr. Dobbs is a two paragraph review. Neither of these are significant. [[User:Miami33139|Miami33139]] ([[User talk:Miami33139|talk]]) 18:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' The sources provided by Whpq establish notability. The Dr. Dobbs source provides a lengthy two paragraph discussion that is solely about SmartScript; then, it compares SmartScript with another software. The depth of coverage in this article qualifies as "significant" coverage. Furthermore, [http://www.sdtimes.com/link/28630 this article] from SV Times provides some basic information about SmartScript. This article does not read like a press release (it does not contain promotional language) and is published by ''SD Times'', a reliable source. [[User:Cunard|Cunard]] ([[User talk:Cunard|talk]]) 08:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
| |||