Revision as of 23:20, 29 October 2009 edit 171.66.109.31 (talk) →Material deleted from "Carl Hewitt, the Actor model, and the birth of Scheme" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:32, 1 November 2009 edit undo 76.254.235.105 (talk) quotation from article published in "ActorScript(TM): Industrial strength integration of local and nonlocal concurrency for Client-cloud Computing" ArXiv 0907.3330 Next edit →
Line 25: I wonder if there are other topics like the above that should be included.[[Special:Contributions/171.66.109.31\|171.66.109.31]] ([[User talk:171.66.109.31\|talk]]) 23:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC) The quotation deleted from the article published in [http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.3330 ''ActorScript(TM): Industrial strength integration of local and nonlocal concurrency for Client-cloud Computing'' ArXiv 0907.3330 ] is as follows: : [Sussman and Steele 1975] mistakenly concluded “we discovered that the 'Actors' and the lambda expressions were identical in implementation.” The actual situation is that the lambda calculus is capable of expressing some kinds of sequential and parallel control structures but, in general, not the concurrency expressed in the Actor model. On the other hand, the Actor model is capable of expressing everything in the lambda calculus and more. [[Special:Contributions/76.254.235.105\|76.254.235.105]] ([[User talk:76.254.235.105\|talk]]) 18:32, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Talk:History of the Scheme programming language: Difference between revisions