Content deleted Content added
quotation from article published in "ActorScript(TM): Industrial strength integration of local and nonlocal concurrency for Client-cloud Computing" ArXiv 0907.3330 |
Pi Delport (talk | contribs) →Material deleted from "Carl Hewitt, the Actor model, and the birth of Scheme": respond to 171.66.109.31 |
||
Line 25:
I wonder if there are other topics like the above that should be included.[[Special:Contributions/171.66.109.31|171.66.109.31]] ([[User talk:171.66.109.31|talk]]) 23:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
: What Hayes or Hewitt thought of the construct is not relevant to this article, unless it touched Scheme's history somehow.
: There is little evidence for the controversy you contend: Sussman and Steele made a claim about the subset of actors they implemented, not about the actor model in general, and specifically excepted that cells and serializers are not isomorphic to lambda calculus closures. Hewitt agreed with and confirmed both these observations. (See ''The First Report on Scheme Revisited''.)
: <span style="white-space:nowrap">—[[User:Piet Delport|Piet Delport]] <small>([[User talk:Piet Delport|talk]]) 2009-11-02 20:29</small></span>
The quotation deleted from the article published in [http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.3330 ''ActorScript(TM): Industrial strength integration of local and nonlocal concurrency for Client-cloud Computing'' ArXiv 0907.3330 ] is as follows:
| |||