Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Network Analysis Module: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Cisco Network Analysis Module: delete |
Author's response on article |
||
Line 18:
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—<font face="Century Gothic">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</font> 13:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Not only is this advertising, but it makes no attempt to show historical or technical importance, and this software with "6000 customers" is only going to be of interest to a small number of people. Yes, there are [[WP:OTHERSTUFF|many other software articles]] that ought to be deleted as well. In the fullness of time, we may get around to them. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 20:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
* Either the admins are not reading the article, or I am doing a real poor job in explaining the concept. First, this is *not* a software - it is a hardware based offering and has added on a virtual platform recently. Second, this is not a product that you would use in your home - it is used by large enterprises and service providers globally. Finally, your reference to "6000 customers" is in poor spirit - if you have not heard about it, is exactly why I put in the article. This product has been around since 2000 and is the only integrated service management offering by Cisco. Can you please tell me which exact statement in the article is advertising? I took great pains to make it factual. I am happy to change it further. You have a valid point on historical references - and I will dig up historical information and post that here.
However, this auto-reply of "Delete" without even understanding the article reflects very poorly on the admins. Isn't that the point of Wikipedia of "Educating someone" ? [[User:Ash1932|Ash1932]] ([[User talk:Ash1932|talk]]) 21:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||