Automated Content Access Protocol: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:51, 8 November 2009

Revision as of 09:55, 8 November 2009

Line 36:

* [[Ringier]]

* [[Sanoma Corporation]]

==References==

{{Reflist}}

==External links==

* [http://www.the-acap.org/ Official website]

* [http://media.guardian.co.uk/columnists/story/0,,1935057,00.html ArticleAGoogle's abouthunger ACAPfor andthe Googlenews] in ''[[The Guardian]]'' newspaper

* [http://www.yelvington.com/20061016/why_you_should_care_about_automated_content_access_protocol YelvingtonWhy articleyou should care about ACAPAutomated Content Access Protocol] (Steve Yelvington)

* [http://www.wildlyappropriate.com/article/139/automated-content-access-protocol-why Automated Content Access Protocol: Why?] - Wildly Appropriate

* [http://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2007/12/acap_flawed_and_broken.php Acap: flawed and broken from the start] - Martin Belam

Line 47 ⟶ 50:

* [http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/531181.php Google rejects adoption of Acap standard] - journalism.co.uk

==Notes and references==

<references />

[[Category:World Wide Web]]