Talk:Plain old Java object: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m unsigned == Special Object == The second sentence adds little to explanation of POJO. Merely saying that is it not a special object while not explaining what a special object or what it lacks that doesn't make it special doesn't clarify much to the r
m unsigned Well, unless '''not''' all POJOS are java objects, but that doesn't make sense.
Line 46:
"All Java objects are POJOs, therefore ideally speaking a POJO is a Java object ..."
 
What does this mean? Does POJO mean the same as 'java object' or not? I assume they do mean something different which means that not all java objects are POJOs. Well, unless '''not''' all POJOS are java objects, but that doesn't make sense. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.73.19.85|75.73.19.85]] ([[User talk:75.73.19.85|talk]]) 16:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
:Well, unless '''not''' all POJOS are java objects, but that doesn't make sense. {{unsigned|75.73.19.85}}
 
== Special Object ==