Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cisco Network Analysis Module: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Closing debate, result was delete |
m Removing Category:Relisted AfD debates |
||
Line 21:
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:JForget|<font color = "orange">'''JForget''' </font>]] 22:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small><small>—<font face="Century Gothic">[[User:J04n|J04n]]([[User talk:J04n|talk page]])</font> 13:59, 1 November 2009 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Not only is this advertising, but it makes no attempt to show historical or technical importance, and this software with "6000 customers" is only going to be of interest to a small number of people. Yes, there are [[WP:OTHERSTUFF|many other software articles]] that ought to be deleted as well. In the fullness of time, we may get around to them. - [[User:Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön]] ([[User talk:Ihcoyc|talk]]) 20:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Line 29:
However, this auto-reply of "Delete" without even understanding the article reflects very poorly on the admins. Isn't that the point of Wikipedia of "Educating someone" ? [[User:Ash1932|Ash1932]] ([[User talk:Ash1932|talk]]) 21:59, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
<hr style="width:50%;" />
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font color="navy">'''[[User:NuclearWarfare|NW]]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|Talk]]</font>)'' 00:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
'''i'm sure this deserves a sentence somewhere''' but we don't need an article on it. get rid of it. [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat|talk]])
|