Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROCK Linux: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Ultraexactzz (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7:
*'''Keep''' - I immediately found evidence of [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] when I searched the Google News archives ([http://archives.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/06/12/linux.powerpc.idg/index.html example]). This might be a candidate for being [[WP:ARS|rescued]]. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 14:28, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
**This CNN link is three sentences. I am yawning. Since when did three sentences on a news site justify an ''encyclopedia'' article? [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat|talk]])
*I find this notable because ROCK was one of the earliest "make your own distro" systems, which I was made aware of via print media. This, or a number of committers that contribute these ideas to other projects (Debian, Fedora) would seem to satisfy the notability criteria. [[User:Wikip rhyre|rhyre]] ([[User talk:Wikip rhyre|talk]]) 09:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC) *'''
▲*'''Delete''' - A brief mention doesn't make it notable, and the language of the article is more akin to a pitch than an encyclopedia.[[User:The Zwinky|The Zwinky]] ([[User talk:The Zwinky|talk]]) 17:14, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- [[User:Fences and windows|<span style="color:red;">Fences</span>]]<span style="color:grey;">&</span>[[User talk:Fences and windows|<span style="background-color:black; color:white;">Windows</span>]] 20:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)</small>
*'''unexceptional, go away.''' Delete this stuff. We do not need articles on every single distro kit, even if it gets references, why is the subject important? [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat|talk]])
| |||