Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Candidate statements/Seddon: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Seddon: fix |
|||
Line 7:
:'''Arbitration Oversight''': There have been many times when the Arbitration Committee has overstepped its remit, or have been slow to react to a serious issue, have acted without sufficient due care and attention or just have been so caught up in the huge reams of evidence that even looking at a page puts you at risk of a topicban. As the project matures and [[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimmy]]'s role becomes more diminished and ceremonial , the oversight role he was supposed to hold, should/needs to be filled. This needs to be through the creation of an arbitration oversight body; small in size that it is efficient; large enough to be effective; and most importantly made up of non-arbitrator community members. By working with the community, the committee can solve many of the oversight concerns many members of the community have.
:'''Communication''': Too often the committee remains unresponsive, silent to emails and leaves problems and issues fade away into the deep, dark and dreary depths of thier archives.
*{{admincheck|Seddon}}
| |||