Revision as of 19:08, 15 November 2009 edit 99.29.247.230 (talk) →Material deleted from "Carl Hewitt, the Actor model, and the birth of Scheme": fixed typo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:13, 15 November 2009 edit undo 99.29.247.230 (talk) →Material deleted from "Carl Hewitt, the Actor model, and the birth of Scheme": fixed typos Next edit →
Line 75: : If you want to opine about what you perceive as being strange about Scheme's design choices, you can do it on your user page, a blog, or similar: Wikipedia is '''[[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not\|not]]''' for personal commentary or opinions. <span style="white-space:nowrap">—[[User:Piet Delport\|Piet Delport]] <small>([[User talk:Piet Delport\|talk]]) 2009-11-12 21:05</small></span> ::According to work published at the time referenced above and also including [http://publications.csail.mit.edu/lcs/pubs/pdf/MIT-LCS-TR-154.pdf Semantics of Communicating Parallel Processes] , [http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/6272/AIM-410.pdf?sequence=2 Viewing Control Structures as Patterns of Passing Messages] and [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=512975&coll=portal&dl=ACM Synchronization in actor systems], the following controversies were prominent in the initial development of Scheme: ::hairy control structure ''versus'' Actor message passing ::EVALUATE!UNINTERRUPTEDLY ''versus'' message arrival ordering ::This is what "'''Hewitt is flaming about.'''" [Sussman and Steele 1976] But now, on the basis of no evidence, you claim that the controversy ~~nevery~~never happened.[[Special:Contributions/99.29.247.230\|99.29.247.230]] ([[User talk:99.29.247.230\|talk]]) 19:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Talk:History of the Scheme programming language: Difference between revisions