Revision as of 11:35, 10 November 2009 edit Nerdseeksblonde (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,846 edits →Easy Projects .NET ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:09, 18 November 2009 edit undo Martijn Hoekstra (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 19,333 edits →Easy Projects .NET: +k Next edit →
Line 13: This has been listed for more than two weeks, nobody has made any claim in its defense and it was relisted? Why? Get rid of this spam junk. What does it take to realize PR companies are on to the game of how to get on Wikipedia? Make an account, make a couple useless edits. Write the article you want. Fake the references. Never use that account again. Wikipedia can't compete against the promotional budget of a corporation by playing nice. Get rid of crap promotional articles about products. [[User:SchmuckyTheCat\|SchmuckyTheCat]] ([[User talk:SchmuckyTheCat\|talk]]) 06:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC) * '''Speedy''': I'm not sure notability is asserted and the text reads like an unsourced story. [[User:Nerdseeksblonde\|Nerdseeksblonde]] ([[User talk:Nerdseeksblonde\|talk]]) 11:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC) * '''Keep''': I see significant coverage in independent reliable sources in three external links. That's an easy keep to me. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra\|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra\|talk]]) 00:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Projects .NET: Difference between revisions