Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Projects .NET: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Easy Projects .NET: about SPA, about the sources |
|||
Line 24:
***'''Comment''' I have never spammed, and have in the past approached a fellow Wikipedia admin in order to obtain feedback on the article and improve it. The argument that I have not recently made edits does not take away from the fact that the software in question has received notable industry coverage. '''[[User:Xbammy|Xbammy]]''' ([[User talk:Xbammy|talk]]) 21:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
****Your odd edit contributions history leads one to the possibility that you are a [[WP:SPA]] here on Wikipedia in this case on behalf of promotion of a company. And no, the software in question has ''not'' received significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable]] [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]]. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
*****I concur that your account seems to be mainly used for discussions and edits around this software, which is suspect, Xbammy. Though you have disputed the reliablity of the sources mentioned, Crit, with which I don't agree, I don't see any reason to say the sources in External Links are not secondary or independent. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 22:03, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||