Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Projects .NET: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Easy Projects .NET: add more |
|||
Line 25:
****Your odd edit contributions history leads one to the possibility that you are a [[WP:SPA]] here on Wikipedia in this case on behalf of promotion of a company. And no, the software in question has ''not'' received significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable]] [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|secondary sources]]. '''[[User:Cirt|Cirt]]''' ([[User talk:Cirt|talk]]) 21:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
*****I concur that your account seems to be mainly used for discussions and edits around this software, which is suspect, Xbammy. Though you have disputed the reliablity of the sources mentioned, Crit, with which I don't agree, I don't see any reason to say the sources in External Links are not secondary or independent. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 22:03, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
*'''weak keep''' the BNET review appears solid (if short), the nomination for the award looks minor but vaguely helpful, and the girl-blog-like thing has now shown up enough times in different places that I'm leaning toward treating her as a mildly reliable source. The press release [http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS120469+07-Jan-2008+PRN20080107] from the folks giving the award would actually count as independent coverage even though it is a press release. It's close, but I think its a keeper. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 03:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
| |||