Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Candidate statements/AGK/Extended: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Arcticocean (talk | contribs) |
Arcticocean (talk | contribs) m →Case decisions: Missing word. |
||
Line 14:
* '''Second chances.''' I extend to all the [[Wikipedia:Standard offer|standard offer]], and would abide by the principles of that system if elected. Those who genuinely wish to return to constructive editing are to be helped every step of the way, inasmuch as doing so would not be detrimental to the other functions of an arbitrator. If elected, I would volunteer to deal with banned editors, to allow the rest of the project to get on with writing the encyclopedia; and I would give my time to those who make a good case for returning to a subject area from which they have been banned (or indeed, to the entire project, in the case of sitebans).
* '''Administrator conduct.''' Sysops who cannot be trusted to do a good job should be removed. If the community brings a problematic administrator to the committee whilst I am an arbitrator, I will vote to launch proceedings to scrutinise that administrator's conduct—and will support only those measures which fully neutralise any problems with that conduct.
==As an arbitrator==
| |||