Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Projects .NET: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:03, 23 November 2009

Revision as of 15:01, 25 November 2009

Line 1:

<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">

:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''

<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''no consensus'''. –'''[[User:Juliancolton|<span style="font-family:Script MT;color:#36648B">Juliancolton</span>]]'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[User_talk:Juliancolton|^{<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:gray">''Talk''</span>}]] 15:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

===[[Easy Projects .NET]]===

{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}

:{{la|Easy Projects .NET}} – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Projects .NET|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 November 18#{{anchorencode:Easy Projects .NET}}|View log]])</noinclude>

Line 26 ⟶ 32:

*****I concur that your account seems to be mainly used for discussions and edits around this software, which is suspect, Xbammy. Though you have disputed the reliablity of the sources mentioned, Crit, with which I don't agree, I don't see any reason to say the sources in External Links are not secondary or independent. [[User:Martijn Hoekstra|Martijn Hoekstra]] ([[User talk:Martijn Hoekstra|talk]]) 22:03, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

*'''weak keep''' the BNET review appears solid (if short), the nomination for the award looks minor but vaguely helpful, and the girl-blog-like thing has now shown up enough times in different places that I'm leaning toward treating her as a mildly reliable source. The press release [http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS120469+07-Jan-2008+PRN20080107] from the folks giving the award would actually count as independent coverage even though it is a press release. It's close, but I think its a keeper. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 03:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>