Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Sam Spade: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Question from Alabamaboy: response about insults |
RichardWeiss (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 171:
::Oh, Good Grief, your an administrator! [[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 04:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
:::Your continuing insults speak for themself. As for the deleted link, it is visible to admins. If you wish, I can undelete it so everyone can see the insulting comments you have made to other users. And yes, I am passionate about what is being done to Deeceevoice. To my knowledge, though, I have never insulted anyone. However, I do state my opinion on matters, which to my knowledge is encouraged here at Wikipedia. Anyway, your RfC references insulting e-mails you have sent people and instances like this one [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AFeloniousMonk&diff=19513782&oldid=19494467] where you called another editor an asshole. Would you like me to undelete the RfC so you can see it? Hope you will explain all of this. Thanks, --[[User:Alabamaboy|Alabamaboy]] 14:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Sam's continuing insults? None here I can see. Please don't undelete the Rfc, which I had put a spedy delete on (or was somehow involved in the process) and needs to be seen in the light of the Rfc for Felonious Monk. I would remind you that Rfc's on editors not endorsed within 48 hours are subject to speedy deletion, and that you have no reasonable cause to undelete this one, [[User:SqueakBox|SqueakBox]] 15:24, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
| |||