Content deleted Content added
comment on in vivo staining proposal. =Leftover from Cleanup page (In vivo staining)= |
No edit summary |
||
Line 172:
There actually several types of invo staining. The microscopic stuff can be done using confocal microscopy. Additionally, there are a number of dyes that change flourescence with changes of calcium ion or other ions. Then there is immunostaining and the classic obesrvations of capping and inedcytosis in immunology. Endoscopically, one does Chromoendoscopy to stain tissues during endoscopy, one of the advanced techniques of [[Endoscopy]]. Lastly, there is in vivo staining at surgery, where one is looking for bladder leaks during surgery. So the in vivo stuff is at several levels. It ought to have several articles, some stand alone, so as part of others, as in [[Endoscopy]]. [[User:Kd4ttc|Kd4ttc]] 20:46, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
:The article is too stubbly for words, an probably factually incorrect (I find it hard to merge the present contents with [[User:Kd4ttc|Steven's]] comments). To stain organelles, they generally need to be fixated etc. after [[biopsy]]. Perhaps a full rewrite would be in order.
:Re: [[cybermedicine]]. This is an esoteric subject, and most Wiki Doctors would probably prefer to work on subjects they're slightly familiar with. [[User:Jfdwolff|<nowiki></nowiki>]] [[User:Jfdwolff|JFW]] | [[User_talk:Jfdwolff|<small>T@lk</small>]] 08:59, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
| |||