Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Aranda56: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 18:
#Probaly AFD's and RFA's, also some sports pages.
#Not much, maybe I might leave some AFD's but that's not a really big loss as I'm less active there as in before.
===Questions from [[User:-Ril-|-Ril-]]===
;''Do you hold any strong political or religious opinions (e.g. concerning George Bush, Islam, or on which end you should break a boiled egg)? If so, would you recuse yourself from cases centred on these?''
;''How willing are you to contest the decisions of other arbitrators rather than just "go with the flow"?''
;''Do you view all requests to re-address cases, particularly requests made by those most penalised, as being automatically without merit?''
;''In the case against Yuber, it was decided by the arbitration committee that it is the duty of arbitrators to investigate, and rule on the behaviour of not only one party involved, but all of them. Do you support this decision?''
--[[User:-Ril-|Victim of signature fascism]] 17:36, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||