Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Ajwebb: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Answer Questions |
||
Line 3:
===Questions from [[User:-Ril-|-Ril-]]===
;''Do you hold any strong political or religious opinions (e.g. concerning George Bush, Islam, or on which end you should break a boiled egg)? If so, would you recuse yourself from cases centred on these?''
I hold political opinions. However, I do not hold strong religious opinions. I was raised as a Christian, but I do not hold any opinions regarding religion. If a case was centered on politics, I would not "choose sides" because of a political opinion that I might have. All users deserve fairness, and it is my duty to make sure that their case is looked at fairly, no matter what my political opinions are. [[User:Ajwebb|Ajwebb]]
;''How willing are you to contest the decisions of other arbitrators rather than just "go with the flow"?''
I do not wish to cause arguments or disputes with other arbitrators. However, if I feel that a decision is not valid I will contest it so that the parties involved are treated fairly. From this point, I hope that the other arbitrator and I are able to reach a fair decision. [[User:Ajwebb|Ajwebb]]
;''Do you view all requests to re-address cases, particularly requests made by those most penalised, as being automatically without merit?''
No. I do not believe that this is what Wikipedia or the Arbitration Committee stands for. All users of Wikipedia deserve fairness, and that is what I intend to uphold. Every request will deserve the same attention and respect as another. [[User:Ajwebb|Ajwebb]]
;''In the case against Yuber, it was decided by the arbitration committee that it is the duty of arbitrators to investigate, and rule on the behaviour of not only one party involved, but all of them. Do you support this decision?''
Yes. I believe that we need to look at all parties involved so that we maintain fairness. We cannot accurately make a decision by looking at one party, because other parties may have been involved or caused a dispute themselves. [[User:Ajwebb|Ajwebb]]
--[[User:-Ril-|Victim of signature fascism]] 17:35, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||