Talk:Comparison of HTML editors: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:16, 10 January 2010

Revision as of 20:02, 10 January 2010

Line 46:

::Hi, Nopedia. I don't make a habit of reading the talk pages for relatively uncontroversial articles before making relatively innocuous changes. It's probably safe to assume the vast majority of edits to Wikipedia are made this way. So please don't feel frustrated—you've done the right thing, sending me a message to ask me to explain, and now we can talk it out.

::My reasoning for removing emacs was simple: I didn't see any compelling reason to list a general-purpose text editor in an article on purpose-built HTML editors, when the article already states plainly that many generic text editors have features to make editing HTML easier and links to a page comparing them. I was too brusque in my edit comment, and I'm sure my intent didn't come across well. Hopefully it is more clear now. —<span class="user-sig user-horsepunchkid">[[User:HorsePunchKid|HorsePunchKid]] ([[User talk:HorsePunchKid|talk]]) <span class="user-sig-date">2010-01-10&nbsp;19:15:11[[ISO 8601|Z]]</span></span>

:Hi, HorsePunchKid. I do not think the page is about "html only" editors. That would help no one. I think we should understand the criteria as "good html" editors. Don't you?--[[User:Nopedia|Nopedia]] ([[User talk:Nopedia|talk]]) 20:02, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

== Preview Pane ==