Comparison of multi-paradigm programming languages: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:14, 27 December 2005

Revision as of 06:44, 5 January 2006

Line 12:

*[[Functional programming|functional]], [[Imperative programming|imperative]]

**[[APL programming language|APL]]

*functional, [[Logic programming|logic-based]]

**[[ALF programming language|ALF]]

**[[Curry programming language|Curry]]

*functional, [[Object-oriented programming|object-oriented]] ([[Class (computer science)|class-based]])

**[[Common Lisp]]

Line 28 ⟶ 27:

*[[Concurrent programming language|concurrent]], [[dataflow]], functional

**[[SISAL]]

*concurrent, functional, logic

**[[Curry programming language|Curry]]

*functional, imperative, object-oriented (class-based)

**[[BETA]]

Line 43 ⟶ 44:

*functional, imperative, concurrent, object-oriented (class-based)

**[[Ruby_programming_language|Ruby]]

*functional, imperative, logic-based, object-oriented (class-based)

**[[Leda programming language|Leda]]

*imperative, logic-based, object-oriented (class-based), rule-based

**[[ROOP programming language|ROOP]]

*functional, imperative, object-oriented (prototype-based), [[Dialecting|dialected]]

Line 51 ⟶ 52:

===Five paradigms===

* concurrent, [[Distributed programming|distributed]], generic (template metaprogramming), imperative, object-oriented (class-based)

**[[Ada programming language|Ada]]

===Eight paradigms===

*concurrent, [[Constraint programming|constraint]], dataflow, distributed, functional (evaluation: [[Eager evaluation|eager]], [[Lazy evaluation|lazy]]), imperative, [[Logic programming|logic]], object-oriented (class-based)

**[[Oz programming language|Oz]]

***[[Mozart Programming System]] a [[multiplatform]] Oz