Revision as of 04:58, 2 September 2003 edit Fubar Obfusco (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 7,226 edits object system answer ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:57, 17 March 2004 edit undo 82.32.84.125 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 54: :OOP doctrines such as the use of accessor methods to read data members are not enforced in Python. Just as Python offers [[functional programming]] constructs but does not attempt to demand referential transparency (contra [[Scheme programming language\|Scheme]]), it offers (and extensively uses!) its object system but does not demand OOP behavior (contra [[Java programming language\|Java]]). --[[User:Fubar Obfusco\|FOo]] 04:58, 2 Sep 2003 (UTC) ---- ==Collection types== Python 2.3 now comes with an un-ordered collection type, the set. I too will refrain from adding to the Python Wiki page as I cannot match the high standard of the article. - Paddy3118

Talk:Python (programming language): Difference between revisions