Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 229:
:That's a good question. I'll let someone else answer it. My question is when we vote, will we have to give a reason why we are voting yes/no. Also is the any rules in terms of responses by those we vote for or against and their responses. What I mean, is this going to turn into a free for all having people attack people that vote no against a candidate and give a reason that maybe the person running (or their supporters) don't like.
:Hopefully that won't be the case. [[User:Davidpdx|Davidpdx]] 04:56, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
: You can vote for or against as many candidates as you like. The system is [[approval voting]]. When voting, you may give a short comment if you choose, but any lengthy comments may be moved to the talk page. [[User:Talrias|Talrias]] ([[User_talk:Talrias|t]] | [[Special:Emailuser/Talrias|e]] | [[Special:Contributions/Talrias|c]]) 11:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||