Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Skyscrap27 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 243:
:::Ok the honest answer. Other than a slight increase in the work needed to put the elections together no hoper candidates are not a problem. Socks and meatpupets are.[[User:Geni|Geni]] 16:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
:::: Thank you for an honest answer. I still fail too see how hard it would be to make an exception for like 4-5 people, you just need to look at the list of the nominees. But, never mind. It's OK. Thanks. [[User:Skyscrap27|Skyscrap27]] 18:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
::::Becuase it would have stopped being 4-5 people in very short order.[[User:Geni|Geni]] 18:56, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||