Talk:Ogg formats in HTML5: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
newest comment to bottom
Line 1:
== Ogg hosting website ==
 
With only Dailymotion listed, the list seems to forget about a few sites:
such as, the internet archive.
example: [http://www.archive.org/details/Abandonedhorrorcolor]
When it's opened in Firefox (version 3.6), I get the following text under the preview and embed this:
<blockquote>
Your browser supports the new <video> tag!
Would you like to try the new <video> tag?
</blockquote>
There must be other sites as well experimenting with the video tag?
Most will work with a fall back of course but anyway, support is support.
Or should we have a special section where it says: sites experimenting with HTML5 video tag?
<br />--[[User:Thelennonorth|Thelennonorth]] ([[User talk:Thelennonorth|talk]]) 13:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 
== HTML comment left on the page ==
 
Line 66 ⟶ 51:
The section entitled "Motivation" reads as original research (or opinion) and offers only one reference, that being to a demo of the Ogg format being referenced in a <video> element. I submit it really needs help or removal.
[[User:Alphaman|Alphaman]] ([[User talk:Alphaman|talk]]) 00:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 
== Ogg hosting website ==
 
With only Dailymotion listed, the list seems to forget about a few sites:
such as, the internet archive.
example: [http://www.archive.org/details/Abandonedhorrorcolor]
When it's opened in Firefox (version 3.6), I get the following text under the preview and embed this:
<blockquote>
Your browser supports the new <video> tag!
Would you like to try the new <video> tag?
</blockquote>
There must be other sites as well experimenting with the video tag?
Most will work with a fall back of course but anyway, support is support.
Or should we have a special section where it says: sites experimenting with HTML5 video tag?
<br />--[[User:Thelennonorth|Thelennonorth]] ([[User talk:Thelennonorth|talk]]) 13:49, 15 February 2010 (UTC)