Revision as of 14:09, 26 November 2007 edit 217.14.223.154 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:42, 16 February 2010 edit undo 77.11.26.13 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 4: ::He is correct, see [[WP:NOT#HOWTO]]. -- [[user:intgr\|intgr]] <small>[[user talk:intgr\|[talk]]]</small> 14:18, 8 October 2007 (UTC) :::Yeah Guys.. Just something to think about.. An encyclopedic Article on time.h would be - well just useless. And i'm happy with the english wikipedia as it is, with thousands of articles to even minor details, headerfiles, comic characters and so on. Please just don't take the german wiki as model, its so full of relevancy that it became entirely irrelevant. Rules like the NO-HOWTO are nice, but only IF the article would be better in an encyclopedic form - not in this case.

Talk:C date and time functions: Difference between revisions