Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Sam Spade: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 254:
[[User:Sam Spade|Sam Spade]] 08:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
==Questions from [[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]]==
1. The so-called "[[User:Sam Spade/Detective agency]]" (also known as "Spade and Archer") seems utterly contrary to the spirit and letter of the Arbitration Committee. Above you have stated that you would not dissolve this "agency" if elected. Please explain how creating a group whose stated purpose is to gather information on potential trouble-makers makes you suitable for the ArbCom.
2. You have admitted religious-based bias against certain groups, activities and behaviours; how can you hold such biased views and yet remain impartial? Or do you intend to recuse yourself from any "contentious" cases, and if so, why should you be elected rather than someone unbiased?
3. You have become embroiled in numerous editing conflicts, some of them long-term and vicious. Please explain how this record should be interpreted as making you suitable for the ArbCom.
[[User:Exploding Boy|Exploding Boy]] 21:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||