Revision as of 00:41, 9 October 2002 edit Mav (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 77,874 edits BTW ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:43, 9 October 2002 edit undo Mav (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 77,874 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 83: And it gets worse from there; not a single example. [[User:AxelBoldt\|AxelBoldt]] 00:33 Oct 9, 2002 (UTC) Articles should of course start with good definition/introduction paragraphs that give a person of average intelligence a good idea what the subject is and why it is important but we shouldn't dumb things down to the point where articles are not useful to people who already know the basics. BTW, we should also aim to be better than Britannica in depth, breadth and accessibility by starting off with the basics and building from there. Just my 2 cents. --[[User:Maveric149\|mav]] 00:37 Oct 9, 2002 (UTC)

Talk:Algorithm: Difference between revisions