Revision as of 02:00, 12 February 2010 edit 210.84.17.212 (talk) →Examples of difficulties introduced by declarativeness? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:51, 26 February 2010 edit undo Pgr94 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 4,993 edits →Is the Mercury project dead?: new section Next edit →
Line 80: == "Good" principles == It sounds a bit iffy to say that it's designed with "good" software engineering principles. This sounds like it's claiming that compiled, static-typed languages are always better than interpreted, dynamic-typed languages. -[[User:Qeny\|Qeny]] ([[User talk:Qeny\|talk]]) 00:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC) == Is the Mercury project dead? == The website seems to be down more often that it is up (4 out of 5 attempts failed this month). The website looks dated and lacklustre. The forums/mailng lists are full of spam. Shame really, because it looks like an interesting language. [[User:Pgr94\|pgr94]] ([[User talk:Pgr94\|talk]]) 14:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Mercury (programming language): Difference between revisions