Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Mailer diablo: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 25:
* If strictly speaking, IAR isn't official policy. However, I think its should be treated as the same way that we treat [[WP:BOLD]] - ''...but don't be reckless!'' pretty much sums up my views about IAR. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 12:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
==Question from Mackensen==
You've indicated above support for the Code of Conduct, while implying that it and the Bill of Rights could be rendered simply as "use common sense." I agree with that view. Taken with your views on Ignore All Rules and WP:BOLD, how do you feel about the following statement: ''administrators wear two hats; that of a sysop and that of an editor. An editor is bold, and may ignore all rules, but a sysop does so at his peril. A good administrator always remembers which hat he is wearing.'' --[[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 00:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
| |||